gravityloss.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the gravityloss.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host gravityloss.com. Currently, hosted in Finland and its service provider is Zoner Oy .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

gravity loss successful technologies today seldom come about due to a grand “eureka” event. rather, they come from lots of people all having little eurekas and little “damn, i was sure that would work” moments. -clark lindsey skip to content home about ← older posts a hacker’s guide to climate change posted on thu, 2018-01-11 by gravityloss interesting take on the basics posted in climate , models | leave a comment usa to exit paris climate accord posted on wed, 2017-05-31 by gravityloss according to some, a letter by 22 republican senators influenced trump. here it is as pdf . (it didn’t seem easy to get the plain text. got it from inhofe’s senate page.) the content of the letter is just about the legalities: how the paris accord could make usa and companies subject to litigation, via epa somehow. i’m not entirely clear on it. nothing is mentioned if climate change is real or not. posted in climate , demotivation | leave a comment against defamation posted on thu, 2017-01-05 by gravityloss cei accused michael mann of various things, and mann sued for defamation. now there’s some progress on the case. “the first line of defense you as a defendant can use in a defamation case, when you’ve done a good job, is that what you’ve said is true. they don’t even attempt to make that argument” http://rabett.blogspot.fi/2017/01/the-most-important-political-takeaway.html posted in climate , idiocracy | leave a comment life starts to resemble a computer game posted on wed, 2016-11-02 by gravityloss posted in uncategorized | leave a comment spacex interplanetary transport system architecture unveiled posted on wed, 2016-09-28 by gravityloss they didn’t seem to optimize so feverishly for low trans mars injection mass. kudos for orbit refueling and planning for refueling on mars, asteroids, europa, callisto or what you have! i’m sure the architecture will still change drastically, it looks like a draft. for example, just look at those huge windows. but it’s a big game opener. posted in architecture , rlv:s , spacex | leave a comment spacex first landing flight: data posted on wed, 2015-12-23 by gravityloss spacex’s first landing flight’s data at flightclub.io posted in spacex | leave a comment spacex did it – what it should do next posted on wed, 2015-12-23 by gravityloss congratulations to spacex who landed the first stage intact. assuming cost is roughly related to stage mass and engine count, reusing the first stage saves 9/10 of the whole rocket cost. if they can run the stage ten times, that means on average two new engines per flight as opposed to the original ten, meaning five fold savings. now there’s a few very interesting questions. first is the amount of flights they can get per engine. first, i assume it’s going to be a low count, and experimental at that. once they inspect and test the engines, they can improve them further. second is the ultimate development of the refurbishment process that has to be done to the vehicle between flights. if the turnaround takes a month and 200 people of three shifts each, then it doesn’t save much money, and might even be more expensive than just building a new stage. if it requires one crane operator to drive some support tower there, place a new second stage, place a new payload, place fuel connections. after refueling they need some air traffic control type permission to fly again in a few hours. then it has the potential to not only save a lot of money, but to place very large masses to orbit in a relatively short time. i realize such a vision is still quite far off. even if all the ground operations were somehow solved, just the winds frequently limit the launch and landing quite a lot at the moment. second stage at the moment the second stage resembles the first one, only with one engine. however it is thrown away after use, as it’s hard to recover. the first stage is easy to recover because it’s not yet very high or fast when it starts the return trip. on the other end of the stack, the dragon capsule is relatively easy to recover since it’s so small, so you can make it really sturdy, put a lot of heat shield and parachutes (and rcs rockets on it), and it still doesn’t kill the total weight budget. you can also transport it over sea or land if need be. one way to get around this would be to combine the second stage and the crew vehicle into one system. it is much more complicated to design though. we don’t want something as heavy as the space shuttle, and missions likely won’t need as much cross range anyway. if a large portion of the flights are tanker flights, one might also not need a separate payload stage at all. fit the second stage with rcs systems etc and transfer the propellant directly from its tanks. this could save costs a lot. the propellant depot would have most of the complexity, including the robot arm etc as it’s not being thrown away on every flight. bfr – what do they need it for? elon musk’s bfr plan is for about a 200 ton payload to low earth orbit, with 30 larger lox-methane raptor engines in the first stage. he plans to launch three, with two being refueling launches, so the mars stack will be 600 tons upon leaving earth orbit. with falcon 9 rockets and 10 t per flight, one would need 60 flights for a similar mass – surely hard to reach reliably and with a very long schedule – with last week’s technology! but now, if the rocket can really be made to work reliably and simply in a refuel and go again fashion, it seems feasible. if, with some development, a single falcon 9r flies once per week on average, it can place 500 tons per year to orbit, at relatively little cost. a fleet of twelve rockets might do it in a month! on the side, they would also have a myriad of other uses, revolutionizing spacefaring! also, if we can routinely get to earth orbit relatively cheaply, we can start developing asteroid exploitation technology a lot sooner. asteroids are the easiest source of materials in space since the delta vee and peak thrust needed to get to them and from them to basically anywhere in space is the lowest. i consider the small moons of mars pretty much equivalent to asteroids in some senses too. if you don’t need high peak thrust, you can do everything with high efficiency in space propulsion, and not rockets. think ion engines or electrostatic sails or what ever. the only downside is the long flight time, but if the raw material hauling is done with robots anyway, i don’t see a problem with that. we just have to plan ahead. sorry, space truckers! now, my vision is this: – falcon 9r and equivalents flying to low earth orbit frequently with little cost per flight, and – propellants and raw materials brought from asteroids to earth or mars orbit or to the various lagrange points, or even to cycling orbits (between earth and mars for example) with slow unmanned vehicles with high efficiency electric propulsion with these you got yourself suddenly a potential for actually bringing humans to mars in a relatively sustainable way. so, elon, please don’t build the bfr unless you’re sure it’s absolutely needed. posted in architecture , depot , design , engines , industry , launchers , lunar , rlv:s , spacecraft , spacex , transportation | leave a comment “space is hard” is the wrong answer posted on mon, 2014-11-03 by gravityloss they say “ space is hard ” orbital sciences crashed a rocket equipped with two 40 year old engines. physically that old. they were an interim solution and they were working towards new engines. we don’t know at this point if the engines were to blame, but, to me, it is likely: engine brightening and thrust loss points to that. no people were hurt. in may this year, a similar nk-33 engine exploded in a test stand at nasa stennis. last friday, scaled composites’ spaceshiptwo disintegrated soon after its hybrid rocket engine was started. one of the two pilots was killed. many leaders had already quit the organization this year. scaled had been critizised by some people in t

URL analysis for gravityloss.com

http://www.gravityloss.com/category/journalism/
http://www.gravityloss.com/page/2/
http://www.gravityloss.com/tag/rlv/
http://www.gravityloss.com/2013/07/trying-tumblr-again/
http://www.gravityloss.com/tag/global-warming/
http://www.gravityloss.com/tag/spacex/
http://www.gravityloss.com/tag/michael-alsbury/
http://www.gravityloss.com/tag/whiteknightwo/
http://www.gravityloss.com/tag/ares/
http://www.gravityloss.com/tag/design/
http://www.gravityloss.com/2015/12/1473/
http://www.gravityloss.com/2013/07/trying-tumblr-again/#respond
http://www.gravityloss.com/2014/11/space-is-hard-is-the-wrong-answer/#respond
http://www.gravityloss.com/tag/masten/
http://www.gravityloss.com/tag/self-pressurized/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: GRAVITYLOSS.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1622433866_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.joker.com
Registrar URL: http://www.joker.com
Updated Date: 2017-09-29T03:24:07Z
Creation Date: 2010-10-27T05:29:06Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-10-27T05:29:06Z
Registrar: CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH d/b/a joker.com
Registrar IANA ID: 113
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +49.21186767447
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS1.ZONER.FI
Name Server: NS2.ZONER.FI
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-05-19T04:26:56Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH d/b/a joker.com

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =gravityloss.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME gravityloss.com

  CHANGED 2017-09-29

  CREATED 2010-10-27

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.ZONER.FI 84.34.166.22

  NS2.ZONER.FI 84.34.147.22

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .